|
|
Post by CoyotesGM on Mar 1, 2017 17:31:42 GMT -5
Tanking
Re-signing of waived (bought out) players
Draft lottery keep or kill
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2017 8:39:04 GMT -5
I vote to do nothing with tanking assuming a team has a legal and full roster of NHL players. If a team doesn't have an active roster and is tanking either replace the GM (didn't set their lineup) or drop their 1st round pick that year 1 spot (1st overall to 2nd overall for example)
I have no issue with re-sigings of waived players. However, once resigned they should return to the active roster and have to clear waivers again (unless exempt) before being returned to the minors.
I vote to kill the draft lottery here.
|
|
|
|
Post by KingsGM(Nudge) on May 1, 2017 14:03:32 GMT -5
I really hope we do not kill the draft lottery. We really need to do something about the activity around these parks.
|
|
|
|
Post by SensGM Dave on May 1, 2017 14:17:28 GMT -5
TANKING
It's tricky to decide whether or not a team is tanking or not, but if we notice a team has better players in the minors than on their roster, said roster should be adjusted immediately-retroactive if necessary.
RE-SIGNING WAIVED (BUYOUTS) PLAYERS
I have no problem with being able to offer a new contract just like any other GM can.
DRAFT LOTTERY
Keep it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2017 17:39:59 GMT -5
TANKING
As long as theyve got a full roster and arent playing injured players over Healthy players on the bench then im fine with that. but if theyve got three healthy players scratched one night for people with injuries its not okay, they should only have injured players in playing spots if they absolutely have to.
Waived players
If you buy a player out during the season. you shouldnt be able to sign him again until the season ends at least.
KILL the draft lottery
|
|
|
|
Post by BruinsGM on May 1, 2017 17:48:22 GMT -5
TANKING
If they have a legal lineup (we could say 2 goalies in the NHL and 12 active NHL players) then yeah. In another league it's 35 GP minimum for goalies to prevent tanking which is a bit ridiculous but we could get thoughts here
Waived players
This will be a good vote
Draft Lottery
I understand both sides, another good vote
|
|
|
|
Post by CoyotesGM on May 1, 2017 18:20:07 GMT -5
Tanking :
It is almost impossible to tell as life gets in the way sometimes and other times it is strategy as you may want to wait until you call a guy up as you may get another cheap year out of him. If you have 3 guys that are designated in the minors that are active and productive guys in the minors that are not active, that is a problem.
Re-signing waived players shouldn't occur until the next offseason I'm.
Draft, I would like to see it done in the same manner as we did the contraction. Run it through an independent simulator, but I feel the outcry some would have if the top overall pick slides 3 spots to 4 or 7th place drops back two spots.
We will hold a vote for each one in the coming weeks.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2017 20:24:12 GMT -5
Tanking: As long as someone has an active roster, I don't see an issue.
I don't think the owner that buys out a player should be able to sign that player again.
Kill the draft lottery
|
|
|
|
Post by PenguinsGM(Beamer) on May 2, 2017 8:27:16 GMT -5
Tanking: Agreed with most - so long as productive guys in minors are moved up in a timely manner and non-active guys aren't taking up NHl roster spots, all is good. Waived players - team buying him out cannot sign him until season ends KEEP the Draft Lottery - unique, random picking based on real life draft odds. One question...Frank - Parks?  I think you emans parts. |
|
|
|
Post by HabsGM on May 2, 2017 11:01:54 GMT -5
See PENS for my votes
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 2, 2017 11:56:49 GMT -5
If everyone interprets a "waived" player as someone bought out of their contract them I'm on board with not letting the team resign them. That said, waiving a player usually means sending them to the minors from active roster. If the second interpretation is the case then I stick with my original vote on that, if not then I revert my vote to not allowing resigns of waived players.
|
|
|
|
Post by HabsGM on May 2, 2017 12:31:28 GMT -5
A waived player is still under contract, ARZ should have said "resigning of players bought out". My interpretation...
|
|
|
|
Post by SensGM Dave on May 2, 2017 13:14:06 GMT -5
A waived player is still under contract, ARZ should have said "resigning of players bought out". My interpretation... Yes...and I think most understand that. |
|
|
|
Post by BruinsGM on May 3, 2017 18:17:45 GMT -5
Since we have differences in opinion, let's start with voting on tanking with varying degrees of punishment?
|
|
|
|
Post by CoyotesGM on May 3, 2017 22:35:02 GMT -5
I'd say vote on an easy one first to get the juices flowing
|
|
|
|
Post by KingsGM(Nudge) on May 4, 2017 12:33:32 GMT -5
Tanking: Agreed with most - so long as productive guys in minors are moved up in a timely manner and non-active guys aren't taking up NHl roster spots, all is good. Waived players - team buying him out cannot sign him until season ends KEEP the Draft Lottery - unique, random picking based on real life draft odds. One question...Frank - Parks? I think you emans parts. Why can't I use Parks ? |
|
I think you emans parts.
Oct 3, 2019 7:29:01 GMT -5
Oct 3, 2019 7:29:01 GMT -5